Materials and Finishes for Automatic Soap Dispensers: Stainless Steel vs ABS vs Brass Body Durability for Commercial Use

For

Materials and Finishes for Automatic Soap Dispensers: Stainless Steel vs ABS vs Brass Body Durability for Commercial Use

Not all automatic soap dispensers survive real commercial conditions. In high traffic restrooms, the dispenser housing is exposed to constant contact, aggressive cleaning, moisture, and sometimes vandalism. The internal pump and valves deal with soap viscosity, residue buildup, and long idle periods that can lead to clogging. When material selection is wrong, the result is familiar to AEC teams: cracked housings, peeling finishes, leaking pumps, and repeat service calls.

For commercial projects, the material and finish should be treated like any other high touch architectural component. The goal is predictable life cycle performance under cleaning chemistry, humidity, and real user behavior.

Working definition

In this article:

Premium material build means metal housings such as stainless steel, with robust internal components and documented commercial installation support.

Budget material build means thin plastic housings, lighter duty internals, and limited documentation, often targeted to residential or light commercial use.

Both can be appropriate. The difference is matching durability to traffic level, abuse risk, and maintenance capacity.

Material tiers: what counts as commercial durable

Tier 1: Stainless steel housings

Stainless steel housings are common in commercial automatic dispensers because they resist corrosion, handle frequent cleaning, and tolerate higher impact than many plastics. In public restrooms, stainless is also used in tamper resistant and vandal resistant dispenser designs.
https://www.vandalstop.com/vandal-resistant-soap-and-sanitizer-dispensers

Stainless selection matters. Many restroom products use 304 stainless, which performs well in many indoor environments but can be challenged by higher chlorides or harsh chemical exposure. Alloy selection guidance often notes that 304 and 304L are widely used successfully in fresh waters with low chloride levels, and higher chlorides increase risk of pitting and crevice corrosion.
https://www.penflex.com/news/chloride-chlorine-levels-and-stainless-steel-alloy-selection/

Where stainless performs best:

Airports, campuses, stadiums, transit hubs
High humidity restrooms with frequent cleaning
Facilities where vandal resistance is a concern
Projects that need long term appearance consistency

Common risks to manage:

Chloride heavy environments and harsh cleaners can accelerate corrosion at seams and crevices
Poor mounting that allows flex can loosen fasteners over time

Tier 2: ABS plastic housings

ABS is widely used for dispenser bodies because it is impact resistant and cost effective. ABS is an engineering thermoplastic known for toughness and rigidity, but its long term performance depends heavily on wall thickness, internal ribbing, and how the unit is mounted.
https://www.specialchem.com/plastics/guide/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene-abs-plastic

ABS chemical compatibility should be checked against the cleaning program. Chemical exposure is a major cause of plastic discoloration and embrittlement in commercial restrooms.
https://k-mac-plastics.com/data-sheets/abs_chemical_resistance.htm

Where ABS performs best:

Medium traffic restrooms with controlled cleaning routines
Back of house restrooms where appearance is less critical
Projects that prioritize cost control with planned replacement cycles

Common risks to manage:

Brittleness and cracking at screw bosses if over tightened
Finish appearance aging faster under strong disinfectants
UV exposure near daylight can discolor some plastics over time

Tier 3: Brass body and brass pump assemblies

Brass is often used for pump mechanisms and some heavy duty dispenser bodies because it supports tight tolerances and durability under repetitive cycling. In many commercial designs, a metal housing is paired with brass internal pump parts to reduce leakage and extend service life.
https://enbath.com/product/commercial-soap-dispenser-wall-mount-stainless-steel-wall-mounted-soap-dispenser-for-bathroom-new-superior-design-with-premium-anti-leak-pump-and-corrosion-proof-lining-37oz-1100ml-by-enbath/

Where brass internals perform best:

High use restrooms where cycle count is high
Facilities that need predictable dosing over time
Environments where leaks create liability and housekeeping issues

Common risks to manage:

Compatibility with soap chemistry and residue buildup
Serviceability and access to replacement pump components

Finish durability: what specifiers should actually evaluate

Many projects choose finishes for aesthetics, but the long term look is controlled by finish technology and cleaning chemistry.

Common finish technologies used on stainless or metal housings include:

PVD coatings

PVD finishes are often specified for durability and scratch resistance in high touch restroom products. Manufacturers and restroom product suppliers note PVD for long term durability and resistance to harsh chemicals in high traffic settings.
https://www.dolphinsolutions.com/us/about/restroom-product-finishes/pvd-coated-restroom-products/

Powder coating

Powder coating is used for matte black and color finishes. Performance depends on surface prep, coating thickness, and chemical resistance. It can look strong in design packages but may show abrasion at touch points faster than metallic finishes.

Brushed versus polished stainless

Brushed stainless can hide scratches and fingerprints better than polished finishes. Polished surfaces can show water spots and fingerprints more clearly, which affects perceived cleanliness in public restrooms.

Finish selection checklist:

Confirm the cleaning chemical program early
Avoid finishes that require gentle cleaning in restrooms cleaned aggressively
Prefer finishes that hide wear if traffic is heavy
Require manufacturer cleaning instructions in closeout documents

Technical differences that drive durability in the field

Construction and mounting stiffness

Material durability depends on how the unit is built and mounted.

Key failure points:

Thin plastic housings flexing and cracking at fasteners
Stainless housings that dent if the gauge is too light
Loose mounting that causes micro movement and damages wall anchors

High risk environments often justify tamper resistant housings and locking covers.
https://www.vandalstop.com/vandal-resistant-soap-and-sanitizer-dispensers

Sensor window performance and cleaning

Automatic dispensers depend on stable sensor behavior. The sensor window area is cleaned frequently, and harsh cleaners can haze plastic lenses or damage coatings. AEC teams should confirm:

Replaceable sensor lenses where possible
Clear cleaning guidance for staff
Access for battery replacement without dismantling the unit

Soap chemistry and clogging behavior

Foam and liquid soaps behave differently. Viscosity, additives, and dilution can affect valve performance and prime stability. If the owner plans to change soaps often, select systems designed for that variability and document compatibility requirements in the O and M manual.

Hygiene note: bulk refill and contamination risk

Material selection is only part of hygiene performance. Refill practices matter, especially for open refill systems. A peer reviewed study in Applied and Environmental Microbiology reported that bulk soap refillable dispensers can be prone to extrinsic bacterial contamination and evaluated hand contamination and transfer after use of contaminated bulk soap.
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aem.02632-10

A separate field study evaluated microbial quality of open refillable bulk soap in food service environments and discusses factors that contribute to contamination risk.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X22084575

For AEC teams, the practical takeaway is simple:

If a dispenser will be refilled on site, require a defined refill and cleaning protocol
Prefer sealed refill systems in healthcare sensitive zones when owner policy requires it
Coordinate with infection control standards where applicable

Hand hygiene context guidance:
https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html

Accessibility and placement: materials do not fix a bad mounting height

Even the most durable dispenser fails as a specification choice if it is installed outside reachable ranges. The Access Board notes that reach range requirements apply to operable portions of elements, including controls and sensors.
https://www.access-board.gov/ada/guides/chapter-3-operable-parts/

Bobrick’s accessible restroom planning guide provides typical placement guidance and highlights that operable parts for dispensers should be within accessible limits.
https://www.bobrick.com/wp-content/uploads/APG-Accessible-Restrooms_Commercial.pdf

Specifiers should coordinate:

Operable portion height above finished floor
Mounting relative to grab bars and accessories
Avoiding over obstruction conditions such as deep counters

When to specify stainless steel, ABS, or brass body systems

Specify stainless steel housings when:

The restroom is high traffic or public facing
Vandal resistance is a concern
Cleaning is frequent and aggressive
Long term appearance consistency is important

Specify ABS housings when:

The restroom is moderate traffic and controlled
The owner accepts planned replacement cycles
Cleaning chemistry is compatible and documented
Cost control is a priority in back of house zones

Specify brass body or brass pump focused designs when:

Leak resistance and cycle durability are critical
The facility needs consistent dosing over high use periods
Service staff can access and maintain pump components

Example basis of design and category references

Commercial multi-feed and centralized systems change durability needs because technicians service housings less often, while tubing and pump systems become critical.
https://www.bradleycorp.com/product/multi-feed-soap-system

Commercial bulk dispensing system reference:
https://www.bobrick.com/product/b-820/

Category page for commercial soap dispensers:
https://americanspecialties.com/product_category/soap-dispensers/

Stainless steel automatic dispenser category example:
https://www.fontanashowers.com/StainlessSteel-Auto-Commercial-Soap-Dispensers-Pro-s/10148.htm

Conclusion

Material and finish selection for automatic soap dispensers is a durability decision first and an aesthetic decision second. Stainless steel housings tend to perform best in high traffic, high cleaning environments. ABS can perform well in moderate duty spaces when the housing design is robust and cleaning chemistry is compatible. Brass body and brass pump designs matter most where dosing consistency and leak resistance drive operational cost.

For AEC teams, the most reliable outcomes come from coordinating four factors early: expected abuse level, cleaning program, accessibility placement, and the owner’s refill protocol. When those inputs are aligned, dispenser durability becomes predictable and lifecycle performance improves.